Author Topic: The Wrestling discussion thread (Read 43934 times)

ADSplay101 · « **Reply #1575 on:** January 30, 2011, 11:21:47 PM »

Im mad that Hornswoggle was even in the Rumble....that spot could have been saved for someone serious.

.Batzarro. · « **Reply #1576 on:** January 31, 2011, 12:02:16 AM »

The thing I was most upset about was that I was expecting HHH to FINALLY come back, but noooo, he can go off and make some craptastic movie but apparently he won't come back to wrestling. He's good on just the recycled footage they show of him in intros/promos. Was expecting him to be #40 but once I saw Sheamus go out, knew he wasn't gonna show up.

Quote from: azareal188 on January 30, 2011, 11:21:47 PM

Im mad that Hornswoggle was even in the Rumble....that spot could have been saved for someone serious.

What do you expect, it's WWE.

JDubbs · « **Reply #1577 on:** January 31, 2011, 12:29:50 AM »

at least it wasnt TNA's crappy version of the Royal Rumble

Tundra · « **Reply #1578 on:** January 31, 2011, 01:15:31 AM »

Kevin Nash is back for sure... Dont know about Booker though.

♦ßlôödÑinjå♦ · « **Reply #1579 on:** January 31, 2011, 08:59:44 AM »

The largest royal rumble is now arguably the worst in wwe history.

ADSplay101 · « **Reply #1580 on:** January 31, 2011, 09:03:48 AM »

Quote from: ♦ßlôödÑinjå♦ on January 31, 2011, 08:59:44 AM

The largest royal rumble is now arguably the worst in wwe history.

No joke....I think it could have been better if they would have let Booker T stay in the ring longer than he did Same with Kevin Nash. They could have let Kane break his record to.....heres Booker T's special appearance if ppl didnt get to watch

DEMONKAI · « **Reply #1581 on:** January 31, 2011, 02:57:59 PM »

awwww grand openin...grand closin booker T smh

that was cool though

JDubbs · « **Reply #1582 on:** January 31, 2011, 03:31:43 PM »

Kevin Nash can actually still go. yesterday proved that

ADSplay101 · « **Reply #1583 on:** January 31, 2011, 04:08:12 PM »

yeah I dont think Booker T has it in him anymore cuz when he got him he ran 4 miles before he stopped

JDubbs · « **Reply #1584 on:** January 31, 2011, 05:37:14 PM »

for those who doubt John Morrison's greatness

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PHTnnSM-lo&feature=player_embedded#

Space (DCL) · « **Reply #1585 on:** January 31, 2011, 08:02:01 PM »

Quote from: JDubbsIII on January 31, 2011, 05:37:14 PM

for those who doubt John Morrison's greatness

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PHTnnSM-lo&feature=player_embedded#

THATS MAH MAN JOHN MORRISON FOR YA!! I was incredibly impressed with that. I just cant believe they are not letting him have any title shots...well he's had some but he keeps gettin screwed from them...

DEMONKAI · « **Reply #1586 on:** February 01, 2011, 01:19:41 AM »

Quote from: azareal188 on January 31, 2011, 04:08:12 PM

yeah I dont think Booker T has it in him anymore cuz when he got him he ran 4 miles before he stopped

yeh i peeped that

.Batzarro. · « **Reply #1587 on:** February 01, 2011, 01:29:39 AM »

I missed part of the beginning of Raw, kinda confused. They're making it seem like only the winner of the "Raw Rumble" would go up against Miz at Elimination Chamber. If that's the case, why even have that PPV if the main events aren't gonna focus around the said type of matches.?

Also, is it just me, or anyone else think Sting is gonna be showing up in WWE real soon.?

As for Morrison, I think they're realizing the amazing potential within him now. Give it a bit more time and he'll surely be champ. The only thing that seems lacking with him are his mic skills, only when he's face though. Seems just fine when he's a heel.

fer619 · « **Reply #1588 on:** February 01, 2011, 04:58:31 PM »

Quote from: JDubbsIII on January 31, 2011, 05:37:14 PM

for those who doubt John Morrison's greatness

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PHTnnSM-lo&feature=player_embedded#

now THAT'S impressive

i really do hope he gets a good push soon

Quote from: .Batzarro. on February 01, 2011, 01:29:39 AM

I missed part of the beginning of Raw, kinda confused. They're making it seem like only the winner of the "Raw Rumble" would go up against Miz at Elimination Chamber. If that's the case, why even have that PPV if the main events aren't gonna focus around the said type of matches.?

there WILL be a Raw Elimination Chamber match. It will feature all the participants who did not win the Raw Rumble match (Cena, Sheamus, Morrison, R-Truth, Orton and Punk), and it will determine who will get to face the winner of Miz-Lawler at Wrestlemania

Quote from: .Batzarro. on February 01, 2011, 01:29:39 AM

Also, is it just me, or anyone else think Sting is gonna be showing up in WWE real soon.?

what makes you say that?

.Batzarro. · « **Reply #1589 on:** February 01, 2011, 06:09:53 PM »

Quote from: fer619 on February 01, 2011, 04:58:31 PM

there WILL be a Raw Elimination Chamber match. It will feature all the participants who did not win the Raw Rumble match (Cena, Sheamus, Morrison, R-Truth, Orton and Punk), and it will determine who will get to face the winner of Miz-Lawler at Wrestlemania

Ah, alright. Now it makes more sense as to why Lawler won. I'm getting a bit confused as to why they keep putting him in some kinda rivalry with Miz. Like they're trying to give him a push.

Quote from: fer619 on February 01, 2011, 04:58:31 PM

what makes you say that?

The dark promos they kept showing and I noticed a black leather trench coat.

ADSplay101 · « **Reply #1590 on:** February 01, 2011, 08:45:34 PM »

well...this thursday is Feb 3rd 2011. The date TNA has been pushing for the past few weeks now. and just when ya think ya knew who it was that was comin back....you where wrong :O

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhPyvsZiYyM&feature=feedu#

DEMONKAI · « **Reply #1591 on:** February 01, 2011, 09:03:29 PM »

ADSplay101 · « **Reply #1592 on:** February 04, 2011, 08:20:32 AM »

THEY ARE HERE!!!!!!!!!! "THEY" reveal themselves starting at 11:13 Immortal is screwed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68N0f925A0c&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL#

JDubbs · « **Reply #1593 on:** February 04, 2011, 08:58:22 AM »

aka something TNA pulled out of its butt like usual.

ceefus · « **Reply #1594 on:** February 04, 2011, 09:09:57 AM »

WWE promo that features 2 21 11 on Raw is not Sting or UNdertaker U know who it is Its Dustin Rhodes under the name Seven after seeing this WCW promo it would make sense and Vince would fool us all with this gimmick

PS if u add 2 21 11 it equals Seven 2+2+1+1+1=7 Think about it Everyone expected Triple HHH to be the 40th entry to the royal rumble and it didnt happen now people are assuming its Sting or Undertaker Think outside the Box

ADSplay101 · « **Reply #1595 on:** February 04, 2011, 12:01:48 PM »

AJ STYLES speaks truth....to Eric Bishoff

....I know he hit him where it hurts when he told him about his WCW failure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjs0IPEh7UA&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL#

JDubbs · « **Reply #1596 on:** February 04, 2011, 01:08:29 PM »

Quote from: azareal188 on February 04, 2011, 12:01:48 PM

AJ STYLES speaks truth....to Eric Bishoff ....I know he hit him where it hurts when he told him about his WCW failure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjs0IPEh7UA&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL#

AJ must have forgotten who exactly was wall in the ring. Since when did Crimson and Anderson help build TNA? lmao. fail. just like this feud, and just like everything TNA does. all because they planned an angle and didnt make sure they could get all of the people for it and no have to pull something like this piece of crap out of their butt

fer619 · « **Reply #1597 on:** February 04, 2011, 02:42:37 PM »

Quote from: ceefus on February 04, 2011, 09:09:57 AM

WWE promo that features 2 21 11 on Raw is not Sting or UNdertaker U know who it is Its Dustin Rhodes under the name Seven after seeing this WCW promo it would make sense and Vince would fool us all with this gimmick

PS if u add 2 21 11 it equals Seven 2+2+1+1+1=7 Think about it Everyone expected Triple HHH to be the 40th entry to the royal rumble and it didnt happen now people are assuming its Sting or Undertaker Think outside the Box

i dunno, i'm not convinced that it's dustin "goldust" rhodes because of the following:

1) how and why would WWE write goldust out if rhodes will reappear as seven?
2) goldust got injured back in december, and it's said that he'll be out for up to 6 months. it's only been 2 months and i don't think he's recovered fully yet

i know that it's definately not the undertaker, and i still think it's sting

nice video though

ceefus · « **Reply #1598 on:** February 04, 2011, 02:53:12 PM »

@ fer619

think of it this way
This is the same company thats giving Jerry The King Lawler a surprising push for the WWE champion And giving Eve Torres the Womens champion
This is also the same company who decided instead of putting DH Smith in the royal rumble they put Hornswaggle in its place WWE is very unpredictable

.Batzarro. · « **Reply #1599 on:** February 04, 2011, 05:11:02 PM »

That vid with Goldust/Seven/Dustin was bad@ss. It seemed genuine of him but I really don't know how that panned out at all.. If he really felt that way I doubt that they'd do the whole Seven thing to him. However, the date does point to him, so it seems. The promo would be fitting also.. Just not seeing it unless they're letting someone else completely be the character. Maybe they're giving it to Cody. =P Srlsy though, would be awesome to see Sting and that's still my #1 guess but who knows what the hell it really is.

News:

Author Topic: The Wrestling discussion thread (Read 43934 times)

IMT Facebook

Help us by Donating!

IMT Discord

Join us at our Discord! Click the image below!

IMT Shoutbox

Recent Posts

IMT Calendar