Author Topic: People who's works are/aren't open source! (Read 78780 times)

Kung Fu Man · « **Reply #25 on:** September 01, 2007, 09:49:58 PM »

On a side note, good news and better news:
-Hsieh's site is still online now thanks to tripod
-He belongs in the second open-source category it would seem from what info I've been handed.

Mustkillroy · « **Reply #26 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:07:33 PM »

I'm not sure about the rest of his works, but JudgeSpear has stated that his edit of Homer is open source, as long as credit is given.

Also, I believe Warner's stuff is open source, but don't quote me on that.

Kung Fu Man · « **Reply #27 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:11:05 PM »

Warner's stuff is completely open source.

Mustkillroy · « **Reply #28 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:12:04 PM »

Quote from: Kung Fu Man on September 01, 2007, 10:11:05 PM

Warner's stuff is completely open source.

Okay, we have confirmation.

BigJ · « **Reply #29 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:35:24 PM »

This is very informative. I would sticky this since for some reason I have that power, but I don't want to upset anyone

AceWonder20 · « **Reply #30 on:** September 01, 2007, 10:51:35 PM »

I stickied it. Hope I dont get in trouble.

The Rippah, Roo'Jizah Panzermanathod · « **Reply #31 on:** September 01, 2007, 11:20:48 PM »

Alright then. I'm not missing anything, am I?

desgrav · « **Reply #32 on:** September 01, 2007, 11:36:04 PM »

Don't you have to ask permission from warner to edit his stuff?

The Rippah, Roo'Jizah Panzermanathod · « **Reply #33 on:** September 01, 2007, 11:55:58 PM »

Well, KFM said Warner's stuff was open sourced, so I don't think so, as long as you provide credit.

Taka · « **Reply #34 on:** September 01, 2007, 11:57:32 PM »

We really should get in contact with E.R, one way or another. But if he is inactive, and I'm saying he's been inactive for a while, why not use some edit some of his work?

Kung Fu Man · « **Reply #35 on:** September 02, 2007, 12:16:00 AM »

A lot of ER's stuff falls under the completely-edited clause of things: meaning, you can't modify them.

desgrav: it's a courtesy, but Warner stated even here he was open source...though he prefered whatever was made of his characters was better than the originals. On a side note, "his" Luigi doesn't count in that, as it's N64Mario's coding used with permission.

KPT25 · « **Reply #36 on:** September 02, 2007, 12:39:29 AM »

But the sprites from Warner`s Luigi ARE open source though,so you can use them i think...

Kung Fu Man · « **Reply #37 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:13:51 AM »

Right.

Mustkillroy · « **Reply #38 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:16:32 AM »

Quote from: Kung Fu Man on September 02, 2007, 12:16:00 AM

A lot of ER's stuff falls under the completely-edited clause of things: meaning, you can't modify them.

I think that, if Evil Dan doesn't count as original, neither should Spawn. But, hey, it's your call.

dennis872005 · « **Reply #39 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:32:24 AM »

Quote from: Mustkillroy on September 02, 2007, 01:16:32 AM

Quote from: Kung Fu Man on September 02, 2007, 12:16:00 AM
A lot of ER's stuff falls under the completely-edited clause of things: meaning, you can't modify them.

I think that, if Evil Dan doesn't count as original, neither should Spawn. But, hey, it's your call.

I don't think its his call. As long as everyone agrees that it is okay to use spawn its alright, but I am guessing people agree with kfm.

The Rippah, Roo'Jizah Panzermanathod · « **Reply #40 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:33:38 AM »

I just took ER off. But now I see there's a bit of a debate going on.

Should I make a third, "inconclusive" list?

Taka · « **Reply #41 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:37:32 AM »

Make a thread on debate if E.R's incomplete stuff can be used. Like Spawn and others.

Kung Fu Man · « **Reply #42 on:** September 02, 2007, 02:22:59 AM »

Evil Dan was Dan's sprites modified to a mostly palette swapped character. Spawn and Regina are not akin to their bases however in a similar relation.

The Rippah, Roo'Jizah Panzermanathod · « **Reply #43 on:** September 02, 2007, 02:29:48 AM »

So, what else should I edit in?

Taka · « **Reply #44 on:** September 02, 2007, 11:11:49 AM »

Quote from: Kung Fu Man on September 02, 2007, 02:22:59 AM

Evil Dan was Dan's sprites modified to a mostly palette swapped character. Spawn and Regina are not akin to their bases however in a similar relation.

IMO, Spawn is just Captain Americas Pallete Swap, he really needs an upgrade.

b.easy · « **Reply #45 on:** September 02, 2007, 11:39:12 AM »

Quote from: Taka on September 02, 2007, 11:11:49 AM

Quote from: Kung Fu Man on September 02, 2007, 02:22:59 AM
Evil Dan was Dan's sprites modified to a mostly palette swapped character. Spawn and Regina are not akin to their bases however in a similar relation.
IMO, Spawn is just Captain Americas Pallete Swap, he really needs an upgrade.

let's drop the Spawn thing, OK? it's not a pallete swap, it's a sprite edit. Pallete is colors. It's old and incomplete, but it's ER'S original work and his alone.

anyways, Chrono_Strife's characters are open source.

1nonly · « **Reply #46 on:** September 02, 2007, 12:14:16 PM »

obreck2 stuff is open source

Barrysun · « **Reply #47 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:04:27 PM »

well, I beleve the green ranger can also be added to the list as Open source.
for proof, some time ago, I met his creator on youtube.
and he commented one of my videos. (the one where I fought Tsunade with green ranger)
check this out to see just what I'm talking about.

nick09 · « **Reply #48 on:** September 02, 2007, 01:30:52 PM »

XGargoyle's work should be open source because he has not been on for years......

Kung Fu Man · « **Reply #49 on:** September 02, 2007, 02:20:10 PM »

...his site is still very much online Nick. Hell, I spoke with him two months back even.

News:

Author Topic: People who's works are/aren't open source! (Read 78780 times)

IMT Facebook

Help us by Donating!

IMT Discord

Join us at our Discord! Click the image below!

IMT Shoutbox

Recent Posts

IMT Calendar